The Holy Grail Press
Proudly Made On Earth By Earthlings

Word of the Every So Often
placoid: (adj.) This is a word used almost exclusively (though it need not be) to describe nasty, tooth-like scales on some fish (such as sharks and rays) made of dentin that point backward. Basically, a shark’s tooth is a placoid, kind of a cross between a real tooth and a scale. She gave placoid kisses.
Everyday History
On September 7, 1977, the United States and Panama signed the Torrijos-Carter Treaty. It was an update of the original 1903 treaty covering the Panama Canal, but more importantly it established the framework that would return the canal to Panama on December 31, 1999.
Going all the way back to the 16th century, explorer Vasco Nuñez de Balboa (distant relative to Rocky) noticed that in the really skinny part of Panama it was only about 50 miles from the Atlantic to the Pacific Ocean, but a whole lot longer if you had to go around, like 10,000 miles longer.
Jump ahead a few centuries, when folks became serious about digging a canal to connect the oceans. Going through Nicaragua was considered. It’s generally flatter, and there are already several rivers and a big lake there to build off of, but it is further. And there was some concerns with volcanoes and such, but probably the biggest concern was the local government. So Panama it was.
The first attempt to dig a canal across the isthmus was in 1881, led by Ferdinand de Lesseps, the same guy who dug the Suez Canal, along with a whole lot of other guys. They gave up on the Panama Canal when over 20,000 people died from malaria, yellow fever, and assorted other maladies.
Then, around the turn of the century, the United States decided to build the canal. The biggest obstacle was, at the time, Colombia. Panama was a province of Colombia, and Colombia wouldn’t let us build it. So in 1903 the US propped up a Panamanian revolutionary who declared independence from Colombia, which we immediately recognized, and President Rosevelt sent in the the fleet to protect Panama from Colombia. We then signed a treaty with Panama and took over de Lesseps’ failed canal from back in 1881.
It took over 10 years to dig the canal. They began in May of 1904, and finished in August of 1914. The first official transit was on August 15, 1914. Malaria and yellow fever still plagued the second attempt on the canal, but far fewer people died... only around 5,600, most of them Caribbean labours. It wasn’t until 1921, and 25 million dollars in compensation, that Colombia recognized Panama.
In 2016, the locks on the canal were widened from 110 feet to 180 feet. It’s still not wide enough for aircraft carriers or supertankers, but most other ships can pass through, including cruise ships. That is, if they don’t have too deep of a draught, depending on water levels, or they don’t have an air draft over 190 feet high – the distance from the water to the tippy-top of the ship. That’s so they can clear the Bridge of Americas.
And, yes, the Panama hat was inspired by the canal... sort of. The hat was originally known as the Toquilla hat, or the Jipijapas hat, after the towns where they originated in Ecuador. They were worn by people making the canal, and so the name. And, no, the 1984 song “Panama,” by Van Halen, has nothing to do with the canal. Best we can tell here at the Press, it doesn’t have a whole lot to do with anything.
Cartoon of the Week

Stuff
The Great Dumbing Down
On December 19, 2041, late night talk show host “Blabb” McNaughten, in his opening monologue, commented that "anybody who is dumb enough to believe anything the President ever says should go to the kitchen – right now – and take out the heaviest cast iron skillet you have, and immediately wang yourself in the head with that skillet.”
What followed was a class action lawsuit, initiated by a Mrs. Leonard Falco, of Sandusky, Ohio, for the over 28,000 viewers, who, apparently, were not only dumb enough to believe anything the President had to say, but who were also dumb enough to go into their kitchens and hit themselves in the head with cast iron skillets. Fortunately, nobody was seriously injured, though several skillets were seriously damaged.
Lawyers for Mrs. Falco argued that it was “unreasonable for the average person to comprehend sarcasm, irony, or even that somebody was ‘only joking’ and had not intended to be taken seriously,” regardless of the format of the original message. And they won, requiring Blabb to buy each person listed in the suit a bottle of Tylenol and replace all damaged skillets.
It did not stop there. In Upshand V. Rainsford Public Library in the following year, citing precedent in the Falco case, it was ruled that it was not enough that a book was placed in the fiction section of the library, or even that it was clearly labeled fiction on the spine. The library had a “moral responsibility” to ensure that readers realized what they were reading was not true.
Full disclosure waivers were temporarily used, but in the spring of 2045, in Packwin V. The City of Crossgrove, it was ruled that any kind of waiver was not acceptable since it required an understanding of what was being waived. As Judge Alfonso Grey commented “Hell, if they’re too dumb to realize a book about unicorns ain’t true, fat lot of good signing a waiver’s gonna do.”
The National Board of Librarians, in an effort to deflect litigation, themselves sued the Authors’ Guild, claiming that the true fault lay in those people who created fiction to begin with. In the spring of 2046, in a unanimous ruling, the Supreme Court ruled in favour of the Librarians. In further court cases, in particular Cordwood V. The National Enquirer and Billings V. Everybody Possible, it was established that intentionally writing anything that was not true, even if it were clearly marked as such, was a “malicious breech of civil trust,” and, depending on the mitigating circumstances, could even be seen as “a criminal trespass.” It was further ruled that it was unlawful to “write, publish, or otherwise disseminate” anything that anybody simply might not be able to understand. Which was just about everything, including the ruling itself.
Before the full of effect of this ruling was realized, however, it was all overturned. Blabb McNaughten, in an interview with the only remaining news station, Weasel News, in the summer of 2046, when asked for his opinion on everything that had happened as a result of his original statement, commented, “They’re all a bunch of morons.” In the subsequent lawsuit, Blabb was found not guilty when it was determined that, indeed, anybody who would ever suggest such legislation, much less pass it, had to be a moron.
Unfortunately, nothing much changed as a result of the ruling. Commented Mr. McNaughten, “What do you expect? After all, they’re a bunch of morons.”
Contact Us
Comments? Criticism? Insults? Money Orders?
Earl, our editor, wants to hear from you!
(But that doesn't necessarily mean you'll hear from him.)
Send your messages or bank account information to: