top of page

Word of the Every So Often

cambrel:  (noun)  (pronounced:  cam-brewl)  Not to confused with “cambered,” which means to have a slight arch in the middle, a cambrel is a curved piece of metal on which butchers hang animal carcasses.

Everyday History

On September 5, 1793, the French National Convention ruled that it was just fine to use terror to take care of any threats to their newly formed revolutionary government.  In short, terror became an official policy.  So began the Reign of Terror.  That was followed by the Law of Suspects on September 17, which pretty much said that anybody who even appeared to be an enemy of the state was as good as guilty.  And then the heads started to roll, quite literally.

 

The French Revolution is a great lesson in cause and effect.  Let’s start with the French-Indian War, which raged in North America from 1754 to 1763.  Pretty much, it was the British against the French, and Britain won, taking a lot of land from France, but costing them a fortune.  So to pay off their debts, they raised the taxes on the American colonies... without representation, by golly.

 

So the colonies revolted against Britain.  That whole 1776 thing.  The French, who were still pissed at Britain, heavily financed the Americans.  Sure, it greatly helped the Americans, but it left the French heavily in debt.  To deal with all that debt and hungry citizens and what have you, King Louis XVI did the only sensible thing... well, if you’re an idiot.  He raised taxes and ignored the common folk.  The common folk, in turn, stormed the Bastille on July 14, 1789 (France’s Independence Day).  Yeah, the Bastille was a prison, but more than that it was an armory.  As the story goes, the troops inside came marching out with all their guns and cannons, looking mean and determined, turned around, and fired on the Bastille.  A lesson for any ruler:  Never expect your troops to fire on their fellow citizens.

 

And then came the Reign of Terror, led by Maximilien Fran ois Marie Isidore de Robespierre, “him” for short.  In the two years it lasted (1793-1794), it is estimated that anywhere from 30,000 to 50,000 people were killed.  Maybe half of those were guillotined, including Louis XVI on January 21, 1793.   Many died in prison, and many more were just killed without even the pretense of a trial.  When the people finally got tired of the Reign of Terror they guillotined Robespierre, on July 28, 1794, fittingly without a trial.  Another lesson for any ruler:  Summarily killing your citizens is not a sustainable form of governance.

 

And no, Marie Anntoinette never did say, “Let them eat cake,” either in French or otherwise.  That was probably made up to fuel hatred.  It is also not true that her head was taken to hairdresser’s after it was removed from her body so they could do up her hair, which folks had come to despise.  She did, though, have a lot of it – hair, that is, all towering and heavily powdered – what was known as “poufs.”  The peasants saw it as a sign of out-of-touch aristocratic vanity while they were starving.  Her hair was cut off, shortly before the rest of her head, so the guillotine would have a more clear target, which was common.  It is reported that her hair had turned white from stress before she was executed, what became known as the “Marie Antoinette Syndrome.”  But I digress.

 

For the next five years the French government was a little more relaxed.  During that time a certain general named Bonepart was making a name for himself.  When the counsel running France became ineffective, Napoleon took over and crowned himself Emperor.  Then came the Napoleonic Wars, which lasted from 1802 to 1815, which totally shifted the power base in Europe, which led to all sorts of things. 

 

As well, because Spain was busy fighting Napoleon, it led to all of their colonies in the New World claiming their independence.  At one time, Spain pretty much claimed all of North and South America, as well as the Caribbean, and now they had nothing.  And that led to all sorts of things.

 

Meanwhile, the United States remained neutral, which allowed them to expand their territory, such as the Louisiana Purchase in 1803, which more than doubled the US, because Napoleon needed the money to fund his war.  And that made the United States a whole lot stronger, which led to all sorts of things.

 

Mind you, I could’ve started well before the French-Indian War, and I could’ve kept going.  For instance, it can be argued that the Napoleonic Wars led to European nationalism and the shift of power throughout Europe, which eventually led to WWI, which can be argued has never ended.  But we’ll end there.

 

 

 

Cartoon of the Week

27 Grid Lions.jpg

Grid Your Lions

Stuff

Cosmic Rats:  The debate continues

 

by Earl Eldridge

 

Ever since Dr. Ivan Tupidsay announced the existence of Cosmic Rats in 1992, debate has raged throughout the scientific community over the reality of this alleged phenomenon. 

 

After an exhaustive 17 year survey of the Cosmos, Dr. Tupidsay was able to conclude, much to the shock of astronomers and astrophysicists worldwide, that there is no Cosmic Cheese (Astronomy Today, April 1992).  As his argument follows, it would take Cosmic Mice far too long to devour a hunk of Cosmic Cheese.  The Cosmic Cheese, though, has clearly been eaten, which explains why none can be found.  Therefore, there must be Cosmic Rats, since no other creature would possess such an affinity for Cosmic Cheese.  Cosmic Rats, estimated at being perhaps several light years long, are obviously very adept at hiding.

 

Professor Giuseppe Asabuncha, of the Bologna Institute of Technology in Bologna, Italy, has recently announced that Dr. Tupidsay’s research was, at best, horribly flawed.  “His survey was by no means exhaustive.  He only mapped small sections of the Universe…and then extrapolated the rest.  Even those sections he investigated were not representative of the Universe as a whole,” said Professor Asabuncha. (Cosmos Quarterly, January 1995)

 

Still not satisfied, Professor Asabuncha has begun an independently funded search for Cosmic Cheese, which he is confident will once and for all prove the fallacy of Dr. Tupidsay’s Cosmic Rat Theory.

 

Proponents of the Cosmic Rat Theory are quick to point out, however, that even if Cosmic Cheese is discovered it will only strengthen Dr. Tupidsay’s original conclusion.  “It is only logical,” Dr. Tupidsay wrote in the Cosmic Mind (Holy Grail Press, 1995), “that since there are Cosmic Rats there must, therefore, be a cosmic food source.”

 

Recently, Messerschmidt and Baum of Southern Cal have proposed a Cosmic Cat Theory to explain why they have been unable to find any Cosmic Rats. (Cosmos Quarterly, February 1995)

 

“Absolutely ridiculous!” was the response of Dr. Tupidsay.  “It is most obviously an attempt to find a simple explanation for a complex cosmic phenomenon by manufacturing the solution out of pure fiction.”  (Cosmic Mind)

Mr. Eldridge is an associate professor of Astronomy at the University of Milan.  Other articles by Mr. Eldridge have appeared in Cosmos Quarterly, Astronomy Today, and more recently Astrophysicists Digest.  He is currently finishing his doctoral thesis Stars, Planets, and Stuff Like That

Contact Us

Comments?  Criticism?  Insults? Money Orders?

Earl, our editor, wants to hear from you!

(But that doesn't necessarily mean you'll hear from him.)

Send your messages or bank account information to:

Earl@holygrailpress.com

bottom of page